Do socially responsible firms provide more readable disclosures in annual reports?

Walid Ben‐Amar and Ines Belgacem

Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2018, vol. 25, issue 5, 1009-1018

Abstract: This paper examines the relationship between the adoption of corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices and the syntactic complexity of the management's discussion and analysis (MD&A) section of the annual report. Based on stakeholder and agency perspectives, we offer an empirical test of two competing hypotheses. First, we may expect socially responsible firms to provide transparent disclosures because this reflects a firm's commitment to high ethical standards. In contrast, the agency perspective predicts that managers engage in CSR for self‐interest purposes and that CSR‐oriented firms will be more likely to attempt to mislead stakeholders about the firm's actual performance through complex narrative disclosures. Based on a sample of large firms listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange, our results show a positive association between corporate social performance and the MD&A's textual complexity. Consistent with the agency perspective, our findings suggest that managers may engage in CSR opportunistically and use complex narrative disclosures in an impression management strategy.

Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (20)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1517

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:corsem:v:25:y:2018:i:5:p:1009-1018

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().