Do affective reactions to sustainability performance unintendedly influence lending decisions?

Andres Guiral, Doocheol Moon, Javier Perez‐Garcia and Jungyoon Byun

Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2021, vol. 28, issue 6, 1635-1646

Abstract: Recent research finds that affective reactions elicited from exposure to Sustainability reports unintentionally influence investors' decisions and that this bias is mitigated through explicit assessment of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) performance. An unexplored implication is whether this bias can also affect lenders' decisions, where this bias may have serious unintended consequences on the efficient allocation of credit. While investing decisions' main concern relies on stock return maximization, the borrower's ability to pay back the debt is central in lending decisions and may help lenders to compensate for information asymmetry and assess creditworthiness. Using an experimental method, we find that CSR performance reports do elicit affective reactions but, contrary to the case of investing, they do not provoke unintended effects on credit judgments and lending decisions. Our findings suggest that lenders are likely to attribute their CSR affects to its source and use CSR performance as a proxy for borrowers' integrity.

Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2133

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:corsem:v:28:y:2021:i:6:p:1635-1646

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().