ESG Rating Disagreement and Sustainability Reporting: The Role of Reporting Standards and Assurance Practices

M. Arena, G. Azzone, G. Piantoni, B. I. Tabarelli De Fatis and M. Wang

Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2025, vol. 32, issue 4, 5446-5468

Abstract: Though environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings have the common ambition of measuring companies' sustainability‐related risks, their usefulness is undermined by the issue of disagreement among diverse ESG ratings. Among the determinants of ESG disagreement, this paper focuses on the input information used by rating agencies, with specific attention to public disclosures. In detail, the paper aims at understanding whether adopting sustainability standards and external assurance of sustainability reports affects ESG rating disagreement. Based on an analysis of STOXX 600 and S&P 500 companies, and considering leading ESG providers (Refinitiv, S&P, Sustainalytics, MSCI, and ISS), our results show that, whilst the adoption of reporting standards does not influence ESG rating disagreement, the adoption of assurance practices determines a reduction of this phenomenon. Based on these results, the paper discusses implications for regulators and investors and provides paths for future research.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.3241

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:4:p:5446-5468

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().