Measuring Group Differences in High‐Dimensional Choices: Method and Application to Congressional Speech

Matthew Gentzkow, Jesse Shapiro and Matt Taddy

Econometrica, 2019, vol. 87, issue 4, 1307-1340

Abstract: We study the problem of measuring group differences in choices when the dimensionality of the choice set is large. We show that standard approaches suffer from a severe finite‐sample bias, and we propose an estimator that applies recent advances in machine learning to address this bias. We apply this method to measure trends in the partisanship of congressional speech from 1873 to 2016, defining partisanship to be the ease with which an observer could infer a congressperson's party from a single utterance. Our estimates imply that partisanship is far greater in recent years than in the past, and that it increased sharply in the early 1990s after remaining low and relatively constant over the preceding century.

Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (73)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA16566

Related works:
Working Paper: Measuring Group Differences in High-Dimensional Choices: Method and Application to Congressional Speech (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:emetrp:v:87:y:2019:i:4:p:1307-1340

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.economet ... ordering-back-issues

Access Statistics for this article

Econometrica is currently edited by Guido W. Imbens

More articles in Econometrica from Econometric Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().