How Destructive Is Innovation?

Daniel Garcia‐Macia, Chang‐Tai Hsieh and Peter J. Klenow
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Daniel Garcia-Macia

Econometrica, 2019, vol. 87, issue 5, 1507-1541

Abstract: Entrants and incumbents can create new products and displace the products of competitors. Incumbents can also improve their existing products. How much of aggregate productivity growth occurs through each of these channels? Using data from the U.S. Longitudinal Business Database on all nonfarm private businesses from 1983 to 2013, we arrive at three main conclusions: First, most growth appears to come from incumbents. We infer this from the modest employment share of entering firms (defined as those less than 5 years old). Second, most growth seems to occur through improvements of existing varieties rather than creation of brand new varieties. Third, own‐product improvements by incumbents appear to be more important than creative destruction. We infer this because the distribution of job creation and destruction has thinner tails than implied by a model with a dominant role for creative destruction.

Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (83)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA14930

Related works:
Working Paper: How Destructive is Innovation? (2017)
Working Paper: How Destructive is Innovation? (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:emetrp:v:87:y:2019:i:5:p:1507-1541

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.economet ... ordering-back-issues

Access Statistics for this article

Econometrica is currently edited by Guido W. Imbens

More articles in Econometrica from Econometric Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().