Subsidizing Liquidity with Wider Ticks: Evidence from the Tick Size Pilot Study

Robert P. Bartlett and Justin McCrary

Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2020, vol. 17, issue 2, 262-316

Abstract: Using data from the 2016–2018 Tick Size Pilot Study, we examine the efficacy of using wider tick sizes to subsidize market‐making in small capitalization stocks. We demonstrate that realized spreads decay quickly within the initial microseconds of a trade. The effect reduces the subsidy offered by wider tick sizes, particularly for non‐HFT market makers. The profit subsidy from wider tick sizes is also compromised by a significant shift in trading to “taker/maker” exchanges and to midpoint trading in non‐exchange venues. The pilot's exception for midpoint trades also accounts for the fact that nearly a third of trading remains in non‐exchange venues despite the inclusion of a trade‐at rule. Overall, these findings point to considerable inefficiencies in the pilot study's goal of using wider tick sizes to subsidize liquidity provision in small capitalization stocks.

Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12252

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:empleg:v:17:y:2020:i:2:p:262-316

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Empirical Legal Studies from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().