Getting What We Asked For, Getting What We Paid For, and Not Liking What We Got: The Vanishing Civil Trial
Stephen C. Yeazell
Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2004, vol. 1, issue 3, 943-971
Abstract:
The current rate of civil trials may result from two converging trends in civil practice: 20th‐century procedural reforms and associated changes in the organization and financing of legal practice. The procedural reforms required greater pretrial investigation of facts, which in turn often required litigants to make regular investments of substantial capital, access to which was facilitated by changes in the organization of plaintiffs’ practices. Together, these procedural reforms and changes in practice structure provide a plausible explanation for the observed phenomenon of declining rate and number of civil trials.
Date: 2004
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2004.00027.x
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:empleg:v:1:y:2004:i:3:p:943-971
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Journal of Empirical Legal Studies from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery (contentdelivery@wiley.com).