External Review of Coverage Denials by Managed Care Organizations in California

Carole Roan Gresenz and David M. Studdert

Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2005, vol. 2, issue 3, 449-468

Abstract: External review programs have been adopted in nearly every state to give managed care enrollees the opportunity to have certain denials of health insurance coverage reviewed by physicians who are unaffiliated with their health plan. This study explores in depth a sample of cases adjudicated in California's external review program. We abstracted information from hardcopy files of several hundred cases adjudicated during 2001–2002. We describe the specific services involved in external review and the outcomes of review, analyzing the roots of disagreement in cases in which the health plan's coverage denial was overturned. We find that a subset of overturns illuminate tension in the relationship between the external review program's adjudication rules and the terms of the health insurance agreements that exist between plans and enrollees. Two critical questions face designers of external review programs: (1) What deference will be paid to specific coverage exclusions in the insurance contract between plans and enrollees? and (2) How should external review handle cases that blend medical necessity and contractual issues?

Date: 2005
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2005.00057.x

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:empleg:v:2:y:2005:i:3:p:449-468

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Empirical Legal Studies from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().