The Industrial Organization of the Japanese Bar: Levels and Determinants of Attorney Income
Minoru Nakazato,
John Ramseyer and
Eric B. Rasmusen
Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2010, vol. 7, issue 3, 460-489
Abstract:
Using micro‐level tax data on attorney incomes in 2004 (when the law was changed to make it confidential), we analyze the industrial organization of the Japanese bar. These data suggest two sources of high income: an idiosyncratic return to talent in Tokyo and a compensating differential for the lack of amenities in the provinces. The most able would‐be lawyers (those with the highest opportunity costs) pass the bar‐exam equivalent on one of their first tries or abandon the effort and pursue careers outside of law. If they pass, they opt for careers in Tokyo that involve complex litigation and business transactions. This work places a premium on their talent, and from it they earn appropriately high incomes. The less talented face lower opportunity costs and opt to spend many years studying for the exam. If they do eventually pass, they apparently choose between a relatively low‐income career in Tokyo and a provincial career paying a compensating differential.
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2010.01185.x
Related works:
Working Paper: The Industrial Organization of the Japanese Bar: Levels and Determinants of Attorney Income (2008) 
Working Paper: The Industrial Organization of the Japanese Bar: Levels and Determinants of Attorney Income (2006) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:empleg:v:7:y:2010:i:3:p:460-489
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Journal of Empirical Legal Studies from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().