Location, Location, Location: The Impact of Guideline Grid Location on the Value of Sentencing Enhancements
Shawn Bushway and
Anne Piehl
Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2011, vol. 8, issue s1, 222-238
Abstract:
A long literature provides empirical estimates of differential treatment (by race and other factors) in the criminal justice system, taking sentencing rules as given. This article considers the disparate impact of the rules, rather than their implementation, by providing a quantitative assessment of the Maryland sentencing grid for person offenses using the distribution of defendants on the grid. The basic insight is that movement along the grid itself (either across rows or across columns) is nonlinear in sentence lengths (in both absolute magnitudes and percent terms). As a result, an additional point results in a different increase in the recommended sentence length depending on the other factors that are present. Because the distribution of factors is not random, factors like weapon use that appear to have equal weight in the formula developed by policymakers turn out to have very different weights in practice.
Date: 2011
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2011.01227.x
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:empleg:v:8:y:2011:i:s1:p:222-238
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Journal of Empirical Legal Studies from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery (contentdelivery@wiley.com).