Alternative Forms of Mixing Banking with Commerce: Evidence from American History

Joseph G. Haubrich and João A. C. Santos

Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, 2003, vol. 12, issue 2, 121-164

Abstract: Much of the discussion about banking and commerce in America has failed to make several crucial distinctions and has not accounted for many arrangements that have promoted the mixing of these activities. We investigate the history of banking and commerce in the United States, looking both at bank control of commercial firms and commercial firms’ control of banks. We trace how these controls have changed with shifting definitions of “bank” and changing methods of “control.” Despite the regulations prohibiting some arrangements that promote financial control, we find evidence of extensive linkages between banking and commerce in the United States. These linkages usually build on devices that are very close substitutes to the arrangements prohibited by law. Altogether, our findings question the often made claim that traditionally banking in the United States has been separated from commerce. Furthermore, given that research on Japan and Germany has shown that the mixing of banking and commerce matters for a variety of issues, our evidence also raises some questions on similar research in the United States which makes the simplifying assumption that these industries are separated.

Date: 2003
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0416.00002

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:finmar:v:12:y:2003:i:2:p:121-164

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().