Proportional treatment effects for count response panel data: effects of binary exercise on health care demand
Myoung-jae Lee and
Health Economics, 2001, vol. 10, issue 5, 411-428
We define conditional and marginal treatment effects appropriate for count data, and then conduct an empirical analysis for the effects of exercise on health care demand using panel data from the Health Retirement Study. The response variables are office visits to doctors and hospitalization days, and the treatments of interest are light and vigorous exercises. We found that short‐run light exercise increases health care demand by 3–5%, whereas long‐run light exercise decreases it by 3–6%. We also found that short‐run vigorous exercise decreases health care demand by 1–2%, whereas long‐run vigorous exercise decreases it by 1–3%. However, many of these numbers are not statistically significantly different from zero. These findings suggest that it will be difficult to reduce health care cost much by encouraging people to do more exercise—at least in the short‐run. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:10:y:2001:i:5:p:411-428
Access Statistics for this article
Health Economics is currently edited by Alan Maynard, John Hutton and Andrew Jones
More articles in Health Economics from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().