EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A general model of the impact of absenteeism on employers and employees

Mark V. Pauly, Sean Nicholson, Judy Xu, Dan Polsky, Patricia Danzon, James F. Murray and Marc L. Berger
Additional contact information
Mark V. Pauly: Health Care Systems Department, The Wharton School, 3641 Locust Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6218, USA, Postal: Health Care Systems Department, The Wharton School, 3641 Locust Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6218, USA
Judy Xu: Health Care Systems Department, The Wharton School, 3641 Locust Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6218, USA, Postal: Health Care Systems Department, The Wharton School, 3641 Locust Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6218, USA
Dan Polsky: Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA, Postal: Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA
James F. Murray: Outcomes Research & Management, Merck & Co., Inc., USA, Postal: Outcomes Research & Management, Merck & Co., Inc., USA
Marc L. Berger: Outcomes Research & Management, Merck & Co., Inc., USA, Postal: Outcomes Research & Management, Merck & Co., Inc., USA

Health Economics, 2002, vol. 11, issue 3, 221-231

Abstract: Most studies on the indirect costs of an illness and the cost effectiveness of a medical intervention or employer-sponsored wellness program assume that the value of reducing the number of days employees miss from work due to illness is the wage rate. This paper presents a general model to examine the magnitude and incidence of costs associated with absenteeism under alternative assumptions regarding the size of the firm, the production function, the nature of the firm's product, and the competitiveness of the labor market. We conclude that the cost of lost work time can be substantially higher than the wage when perfect substitutes are not available to replace absent workers and there is team production or a penalty associated with not meeting an output target. In the long run, workers are likely to bear much of the incidence of the costs associated with absenteeism, and therefore be the likely beneficiaries of any reduction in absenteeism. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Date: 2002
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (26) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/hec.648 Link to full text; subscription required (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:11:y:2002:i:3:p:221-231

Access Statistics for this article

Health Economics is currently edited by Alan Maynard, John Hutton and Andrew Jones

More articles in Health Economics from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().

 
Page updated 2019-12-04
Handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:11:y:2002:i:3:p:221-231