Determining the optimal combinations of mutually exclusive interventions: a response to Hutubessy and colleagues

Douglas Coyle

Health Economics, 2003, vol. 12, issue 2, 159-162

Abstract: Hutubessy and colleagues have suggested a technique for decision‐makers to employ in determining the optimal combination of interventions. This technique requires the adoption of Monte Carlo simulation analysis to identify the probability that a certain program will be included in an optimal mix given the uncertainty around the program's expected costs and benefits. In this response, it will be demonstrated that this methodology can lead to potential inefficiencies arising through the dependence of such probabilities on decisions relating to other programs and the failure to consider the opportunity costs of obtaining increased health benefits. A simple alternative approach is suggested which avoids these problems. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Date: 2003
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.717

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:12:y:2003:i:2:p:159-162

Access Statistics for this article

Health Economics is currently edited by Alan Maynard, John Hutton and Andrew Jones

More articles in Health Economics from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().