Smoke‐free laws and bar revenues in California – the last call

David W. Cowling and Philip Bond

Health Economics, 2005, vol. 14, issue 12, 1273-1281

Abstract: California was the first state to implement smoke‐free restaurant and bar laws, in 1995 and 1998, respectively. We analyze how these laws affected the distribution of revenues between bars and restaurants. Critics of smoke‐free bar laws have often claimed that a prohibition on smoking reduces bar revenues. Similar claims are made for the effects of smoke‐free restaurant laws. Such claims implicitly assume that a smoke‐free law reduces expenditures by smokers by more than it increases expenditures by non‐smokers. Using tax revenue data from 1990 to 2002, our analysis suggests that the actual effect is just the opposite: the 1995 smoke‐free restaurant law is associated with an increase in restaurant revenues, while the 1998 smoke‐free bar law is associated with an increase in bar revenues. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Date: 2005
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (16)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1016

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:14:y:2005:i:12:p:1273-1281

Access Statistics for this article

Health Economics is currently edited by Alan Maynard, John Hutton and Andrew Jones

More articles in Health Economics from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().