Outcome versus service based payments in health care: lessons from African traditional healers

Kenneth Leonard () and Joshua Graff Zivin

Health Economics, 2005, vol. 14, issue 6, 575-593

Abstract: We compare the more common physician compensation method of fee‐for‐service to the less common payment‐for‐outcomes method. This paper combines an investigation of the theoretical properties of both of these payment regimes with a unique data set from rural Cameroon in which patients can choose between outcome and service based payments. We show that consideration of the role of patient effort in the production of health leads to important differences in the performance of these contracts. Theory and empirical evidence show that when illnesses require (or are responsive to) large amounts of both patient and practitioner effort, outcome based payment schemes are superior to effort based schemes. The traditional healer – a practitioner who offers health services on an outcome‐contingent basis – is advanced as an important example of how patient effort can be better understood and tapped in health care. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Date: 2005
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.956

Related works:
Working Paper: Outcome Versus Service Based Payment in Health Care: Lessons from African Traditional Healers (2003)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:14:y:2005:i:6:p:575-593

Access Statistics for this article

Health Economics is currently edited by Alan Maynard, John Hutton and Andrew Jones

More articles in Health Economics from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().