Designing choice experiments with many attributes. An application to setting priorities for orthopaedic waiting lists

Julia Witt, Anthony Scott () and Richard H. Osborne

Health Economics, 2009, vol. 18, issue 6, 681-696

Abstract: The aim of this paper is to undertake a discrete choice experiment using a ‘blocked attribute’ design. To date in the health economics literature, most discrete choice experiments have used only a relatively small number of attributes due to concerns about task complexity, non‐compensatory decision rules, simplicity of experimental designs, and the costs of surveys. This may lead to omitted variable bias and reduced explanatory power when attributes have been pre‐selected from a longer list. There may be situations where it is desirable to include a longer list of attributes, such as attaching weights to quality‐of‐life instruments to obtain single index scores. We examine this issue in the context of attaching weights to a disease‐specific quality‐of‐life instrument used to prioritise patients on orthopaedic waiting lists in Victorian hospitals. Eleven attributes are allocated across three separate experimental designs and the data pooled for analysis. Pooling is justified given the specific context of the study, including attempts to minimise the effect of unobserved heterogeneity across the three models when designing the study and collecting data. Blocked attribute designs may offer flexibility to researchers when it is not possible or desirable to reduce the number of attributes. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (17)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1396

Related works:
Working Paper: Designing Choice Experiments with Many Attributes: An Application to Setting Priorities for Orthopaedic Waiting Lists (2006)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:18:y:2009:i:6:p:681-696

Access Statistics for this article

Health Economics is currently edited by Alan Maynard, John Hutton and Andrew Jones

More articles in Health Economics from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().