The simple economics of risk‐sharing agreements between the NHS and the pharmaceutical industry

Pedro Barros

Health Economics, 2011, vol. 20, issue 4, 461-470

Abstract: The introduction of new (and expensive) pharmaceutical products is one of the major challenges for health systems. The search for new institutional arrangements is natural. The use of the so‐called risk‐sharing agreements is one example. Recent discussions have somewhat neglected the economic fundamentals underlying risk‐sharing agreements. We argue here that risk‐sharing agreements, although attractive due to the principle of paying by results, also entail risks. Too many patients may be put under treatment. Prices are likely to be adjusted upward, in anticipation of future risk‐sharing agreements between the pharmaceutical company and the third‐party payer. An available instrument is a verification cost per patient treated, which allows obtaining the first‐best allocation of patients to the new treatment, under the agreement. Overall, the welfare effects of risk‐sharing agreements are ambiguous, and caution is urged regarding their use. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (24)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1603

Related works:
Working Paper: The simple economics of risk-sharing agreements between the NHS and the pharmaceutical industry (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:20:y:2011:i:4:p:461-470

Access Statistics for this article

Health Economics is currently edited by Alan Maynard, John Hutton and Andrew Jones

More articles in Health Economics from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().