Mostly harmless regulation? Electronic cigarettes, public policy, and consumer welfare
Donald S. Kenkel,
Michael Pesko () and
Health Economics, 2020, vol. 29, issue 11, 1364-1377
Electronic cigarettes are a less harmful alternative to combustible cigarettes. We analyze data on e‐cigarette choices in an online experimental market. Our data and mixed logit model capture two sources of consumer optimization errors: overestimates of the relative risks of e‐cigarettes and present bias. Our novel data and policy analysis make three contributions. First, our predictions about e‐cigarette use under counterfactual policy scenarios provide new information about current regulatory tradeoffs. Second, we provide empirical evidence about the role consumer optimization errors play in tobacco product choices. Third, we contribute to behavioral welfare analysis of policies that address individual optimization errors. Compared with standard cost–benefit analysis, our behavioral welfare economics analysis leads to much larger estimates of the costs of policies that discourage e‐cigarette use or the benefits of policies that encourage e‐cigarette use.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: Mostly Harmless Regulation? Electronic Cigarettes, Public Policy and Consumer Welfare (2017)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:29:y:2020:i:11:p:1364-1377
Access Statistics for this article
Health Economics is currently edited by Alan Maynard, John Hutton and Andrew Jones
More articles in Health Economics from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().