Grading bias and young adult mental health

Anna Linder, Martin Nordin, Ulf‐G. Gerdtham and Gawain Heckley

Health Economics, 2023, vol. 32, issue 3, 675-696

Abstract: We study exposure to grading bias and provide novel evidence of its impact on mental health. Grading bias, which we interpret as over‐grading, is constructed as the residual of final upper secondary school grades having controlled for results in a standardized test, itself not subject to grading leniency. Grading bias is further isolated by considering only within‐school variation in over‐grading and controlling for prior grades and school production. Using Swedish individual‐level register data for individuals graduating from upper secondary school in the years 2001–2004, we show that over‐grading has substantial significant protective impacts on the mental health of young adults, but only among female students. That grades themselves, independent of knowledge, substantially impact the production of health highlights an important health production mechanism, and implies that any changes to the design of grading systems must consider these wider health implications.

Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.4639

Related works:
Working Paper: Grading Bias and Young Adult Mental Health (2022)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:32:y:2023:i:3:p:675-696

Access Statistics for this article

Health Economics is currently edited by Alan Maynard, John Hutton and Andrew Jones

More articles in Health Economics from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().