Private and public pension schemes: Elements of a comparative approach

Michel Voirin

International Social Security Review, 1995, vol. 48, issue 3‐4, 91-141

Abstract: The comparative approach offers improved understanding of what is at stake for enterprises, workers and States in developing private pension schemes to fill the gap left by public schemes. The features that distinguish private schemes result from the freedom with which they were designed — by enterprises themselves or through collective bargaining — and the limits imposed by growing state intervention in granting fiscal concessions or stipulating social guarantees. Depending on how these various components are combined, private schemes may offers workers added protection or form a source of insecurity.

Date: 1995
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-246X.1995.tb00448.x

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:intssr:v:48:y:1995:i:3-4:p:91-141

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Social Security Review from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().