The case against JIVE

Russell Davidson and James MacKinnon

Journal of Applied Econometrics, 2006, vol. 21, issue 6, 827-833

Abstract: We perform an extensive series of Monte Carlo experiments to compare the performance of two variants of the ‘jackknife instrumental variables estimator’, or JIVE, with that of the more familiar 2SLS and LIML estimators. We find no evidence to suggest that JIVE should ever be used. It is always more dispersed than 2SLS, often very much so, and it is almost always inferior to LIML in all respects. Interestingly, JIVE seems to perform particularly badly when the instruments are weak. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Date: 2006
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.873

Related works:
Journal Article: The case against JIVE (2006)
Working Paper: THE CASE AGAINST JIVE (2006)
Working Paper: The Case Against Jive (2004)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:japmet:v:21:y:2006:i:6:p:827-833

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www3.intersci ... e.jsp?issn=0883-7252

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Applied Econometrics is currently edited by M. Hashem Pesaran

More articles in Journal of Applied Econometrics from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().