The Lucas critique and the stability of empirical models

Thomas A. Lubik and Paolo Surico

Journal of Applied Econometrics, 2010, vol. 25, issue 1, 177-194

Abstract: This paper reconsiders the empirical relevance of the Lucas critique using a DSGE sticky price model in which a weak central bank response to inflation generates equilibrium indeterminacy. The model is calibrated to capture the magnitude of the historical shift in the Federal Reserve's policy rule. Using Monte Carlo simulations and a backward‐looking model of aggregate supply and demand, we find that shifts in the policy rule induce breaks in both the reduced‐form coefficients and the reduced‐form error variances. When the instability of the reduced‐form error variances is accounted for, the Lucas critique is found to be empirically relevant. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (13)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.1129

Related works:
Journal Article: The Lucas critique and the stability of empirical models (2010)
Working Paper: The Lucas critique and the stability of empirical models (2006)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:japmet:v:25:y:2010:i:1:p:177-194

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www3.intersci ... e.jsp?issn=0883-7252

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Applied Econometrics is currently edited by M. Hashem Pesaran

More articles in Journal of Applied Econometrics from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().