The mean squared prediction error paradox

Pablo Pincheira and Nicolas Hardy

Journal of Forecasting, 2024, vol. 43, issue 6, 2298-2321

Abstract: In this paper, we show that traditional comparisons of mean squared prediction error (MSPE) between two competing forecasts may be highly controversial. This is so because when some specific conditions of efficiency are not met, the forecast displaying the lowest MSPE will also display the lowest correlation with the target variable. Given that violations of efficiency are usual in the forecasting literature, this opposite behavior in terms of accuracy and correlation with the target variable may be a fairly common empirical finding that we label here as “the MSPE paradox.” We characterize “paradox zones” in terms of differences in correlation with the target variable and conduct some simple simulations to show that these zones may be non‐empty sets. Finally, we illustrate the relevance of the paradox with a few empirical applications.

Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1002/for.3129

Related works:
Working Paper: The Mean Squared Prediction Error Paradox (2021)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:jforec:v:43:y:2024:i:6:p:2298-2321

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Forecasting is currently edited by Derek W. Bunn

More articles in Journal of Forecasting from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().