After roads and dams: what role for engineers in the poverty reduction strategies of bilateral development agencies?

Trudy Harpham and Lance Anelay
Additional contact information
Trudy Harpham: School of Urban Development and Policy, South Bank University, London, UK, Postal: School of Urban Development and Policy, South Bank University, London, UK
Lance Anelay: School of Urban Development and Policy, South Bank University, London, UK, Postal: School of Urban Development and Policy, South Bank University, London, UK

Journal of International Development, 1999, vol. 11, issue 6, 811-823

Abstract: The role of engineers within the major bilateral development agencies is currently subject to change as agencies' foci converge on poverty reduction, expressed in their support for the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development's (OECD) agreed aim of reducing by half the proportion of people living in extreme poverty by 2015. The focus of development aid has shifted from the prioritization of macroeconomic growth, allied to a flawed assumption that this would filter down to the poor, to a focus on pro-poor growth that provides the poor with the necessary access to the economy and to services that meet their basic needs. Engineers perceive a risk of being marginalized within this new agenda. In many cases their reputations have been closely linked with the construction of large infrastructure projects designed to stimulate macroeconomic growth, the benefits of which were not perceived to have directly benefited the poor.

This case study of a bilateral agency found that engineers have a clear role within the new agenda, and moreover that engineers were, in many cases, unfairly maligned for their previous work. Much of their problem appears to have been one of image resulting from a failure to effectively demonstrate results. This is an issue being tackled by many bilaterals across their sectors: improved needs assessments, indicators and evaluations being among their aims. To achieve this, development practitioners, including engineers will need to improve their use of participatory techniques, involving the poor in the planning, implementation and management of projects|programmes.

The paper recommends methods that development practitioners, including engineers, should use to improve the impact of their interventions. These include the use of participatory methodologies to foster project|programme ownership by beneficiaries, contributing to the selection of appropriate donor inputs and long-term sustainability. The paper supports a move being made by many of the bilaterals away from a project to a broader programme approach to development, within which sectors and disciplines work together to deliver a useful mix of poverty reducing measures. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Date: 1999
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:jintdv:v:11:y:1999:i:6:p:811-823

DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1328(199909/10)11:6<811::AID-JID613>3.0.CO;2-7

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of International Development is currently edited by Paul Mosley and Hazel Johnson

More articles in Journal of International Development from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().