'Epistemological dependency'-cognitive relativism in development thinking

Bianca Többe Gonçalves
Additional contact information
Bianca Többe Gonçalves: Munich, Germany, Postal: Munich, Germany

Journal of International Development, 2006, vol. 18, issue 8, 1151-1165

Abstract: Nowadays fashionable postmodernism entered the realm of development studies as post-development. Although post-development has been widely criticised on account of its political and economic romanticism, many critics nevertheless wrongly praise the methodological 'challenge' posed by post-developmentalism. It will be argued that postmodernism's cognitive relativism cannot be a serious approach to investigate development problems. A closer look at the epistemological divide within the social sciences (Hegelianism vs. positivism) helps to understand why postmodernism's cognition attracts even many of its critics and why universal reason needs to be defended. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Date: 2006
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/jid.1299 Link to full text; subscription required (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:jintdv:v:18:y:2006:i:8:p:1151-1165

DOI: 10.1002/jid.1299

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of International Development is currently edited by Paul Mosley and Hazel Johnson

More articles in Journal of International Development from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().