Preferences over Bank and Family Loans in Rural Rwanda

Jörg Peters, Annekathrin Schoofs and Maximiliane Sievert

Journal of International Development, 2016, vol. 28, issue 4, 623-630

Abstract: We study borrowers' preferences over bank and family loans based on field work undertaken in rural Rwanda. We randomly assigned willingness‐to‐pay questions for a hypothetical loan offer either by a bank or by a family member to a sample of 480 households. Informal family loans are typically easier to access. Because of the social costs they imply, it is widely believed that family finance is less attractive than formal finance. Our empirical results, however, show no significant difference in preferences over these two choices. This suggests that even if formal credits were widely accessible, people would still also utilize informal finance. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/

Related works:
Working Paper: Preferences over bank and family loans in rural Rwanda (2015)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:jintdv:v:28:y:2016:i:4:p:623-630

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of International Development is currently edited by Paul Mosley and Hazel Johnson

More articles in Journal of International Development from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().