Biased Arbitrators and Tribunal Decisions Against Developing Countries: Stylized Facts on Investor‐State Dispute Settlement

Peter Nunnenkamp

Journal of International Development, 2017, vol. 29, issue 6, 851-854

Abstract: Based on UNCTAD's database on investor‐state dispute settlements (ISDS), we find that many cases raised against developing countries are handled by fairly unbiased tribunals. As for ISDS outcomes, the overall ratio of investor wins over state wins is below one. Nevertheless, it is harder for developing countries, compared to high‐income countries, to achieve state wins in international arbitration of investment disputes. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:jintdv:v:29:y:2017:i:6:p:851-854

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of International Development is currently edited by Paul Mosley and Hazel Johnson

More articles in Journal of International Development from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().