Comparison Study on the Performances of Finite Volume Method and Finite Difference Method

Renwei Liu, Dongjie Wang, Xinyu Zhang, Wang Li and Bo Yu

Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2013, vol. 2013, issue 1

Abstract: Vorticity‐stream function method and MAC algorithm are adopted to systemically compare the finite volume method (FVM) and finite difference method (FDM) in this paper. Two typical problems—lid‐driven flow and natural convection flow in a square cavity—are taken as examples to compare and analyze the calculation performances of FVM and FDM with variant mesh densities, discrete forms, and treatments of boundary condition. It is indicated that FVM is superior to FDM from the perspective of accuracy, stability of convection term, robustness, and calculation efficiency. Particularly ,when the mesh is coarse and taken as 20 × 20, the results of FDM suffer severe oscillation and even lose physical meaning.

Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/596218

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:jnljam:v:2013:y:2013:i:1:n:596218

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Applied Mathematics from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().