Comparison of the Flow Fields between Nozzles with Full‐Open and Open‐Close Valves at Transonic Velocity

Zijie Li and Hao Wang

Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2022, vol. 2022, issue 1

Abstract: At transonic velocity, ejector nozzles require third auxiliary intake valves to increase air intake, resulting in good thrust performance. However, different intake structures will inevitably lead to different internal flow‐field structures and thrust performances. To evaluate the differences between nozzles with full‐open valve and open‐close valve at transonic velocity, we established two numerical simulation models to analyze the flow‐field structure and thrust performance in the ejector nozzle. The results show that at the transonic flight state (Ma = 1.2), the mainstream of the two models always maintains an overexpansion state, and the primary flow fields are highly similar. However, the secondary and the third auxiliary flow fields are significantly different. Notably, in the nozzle with open‐close valve, a lateral flow occurs near the wall of the nozzle tail, resulting in several vortexes. Contrarily, in the nozzle with full‐open valve, there is almost no lateral flow or vortex. Further, we found that the secondary flow tends to roll up toward the third auxiliary valve instead of directly flowing into the nozzle. Thus, the thrust coefficients of the two nozzles differ.

Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6875240

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:jnljam:v:2022:y:2022:i:1:n:6875240

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Applied Mathematics from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().