Subgroups of haemodialysis patients in relation to fluid intake restrictions: a cluster analytical approach

Magnus Lindberg, Björn Wikström and Per Lindberg

Journal of Clinical Nursing, 2010, vol. 19, issue 21‐22, 2997-3005

Abstract: Aims. To determine whether definable subgroups exist in a sample of haemodialysis patients with regard to self‐efficacy, attentional style and depressive symptomatology and to compare whether interdialytic weight gain varies between patients in groups with different cognitive profiles. Background. Theory‐based research suggests that cognitive factors (e.g. self‐efficacy and attentional style) and depressive symptomatology undermine adherence to health protective regimens. Preventing negative outcomes of fluid overload is essential for haemodialysis patients but many patients cannot achieve fluid control, and nursing interventions aimed to help the patients reduce fluid intake are ineffective. Understanding the interaction between cognitive factors and how this is related to adherence outcomes might therefore lead to the development of helpful nursing interventions. Design. Explorative cross‐sectional multicentre survey. Methods. The sample consisted of 133 haemodialysis patients. Data were collected using structured questionnaires. A brief self‐report form and data on interdialytic weight gain was also used. Two‐step cluster analysis was used to identify subgroups. One‐way analysis of variance (anova) or Pearson’s chi‐square test was used for comparing subgroups. Results. Three distinct subgroups were found and subsequently labelled: (1) low self‐efficacy, (2) distraction and depressive symptoms and (3) high self‐efficacy. The subgroups differed in fluid intake, but not in age, dialysis vintage, gender, residual urine output or in receiving any fluid intake advice. Conclusions. Clinically relevant subgroups of haemodialysis patients could be defined by their profiles regarding self‐efficacy, attentional style and depressive symptoms. Relevance to clinical practice. Based on this study, we would encourage clinical practitioners to take into account cognitive profiles while performing their work. This is especially important when a targeted nursing intervention, which aims to encourage and maintain the patient’s fluid control, is introduced.

Date: 2010
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03372.x

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:21-22:p:2997-3005

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Clinical Nursing from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().