EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Couples’ thoughts about and expectations of their future life after the patient’s hospital discharge following acute myocardial infarction

Monica Eriksson, Kenneth Asplund and Marianne Svedlund

Journal of Clinical Nursing, 2010, vol. 19, issue 23‐24, 3485-3493

Abstract: Aim. To describe and interpret couples’ thoughts and expectations about their future life after the patient’s discharge following acute myocardial infarction. Background. An acute myocardial infarction is a challenge for both the patient and his/her partner, as it can disrupt family functioning and dynamics. Earlier research has generally focused on either the patient or the partner, and few studies have explored the experiences of the couple. Design. Qualitative descriptive and interpretative. Methods. Fifteen couples took part in individual interviews, 4–8 weeks after discharge. Data were analysed in two phases using qualitative content analysis. Results. The first phase of the analysis revealed two categories: ‘an active approach to the future’ and ‘a wait‐and‐see approach to the future’, both of which described the participants’ thoughts about the future. In the second phase, the couples’ stories were interpreted and grouped into four positions: ‘the life companions’, ‘the tightrope walkers’, ‘the pathfinders’ and ‘the observers’, which illustrated their visions of the future. Conclusions. Our results reveal differences in the couples’ thoughts about and expectations of their future life, most of them managed the situation by having a positive attitude to life and their future. The couples discovered their resources and compensated for or balanced each other in the early recovery period. Relevance to clinical practice. The results indicate the importance of giving both partners the opportunity to express their views of the situation, as this increases nurses’ understanding of the impact of the illness on their life and relationship. However, the results also highlight the significance of seeing the couple and showing them consideration both as individuals and as a unit.

Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03292.x

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:23-24:p:3485-3493

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Clinical Nursing from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:23-24:p:3485-3493