Prevalence of postpartum depression in mothers and fathers and its correlates

Nilüfer Serhan, Emel Ege, Unal Ayrancı and Nedime Kosgeroglu

Journal of Clinical Nursing, 2013, vol. 22, issue 1-2, 279-284

Abstract: Aims and objectives To determine the prevalence of postpartum depression and its connections in a group of mothers and their husbands. Background Although postpartum depression in mothers during the postnatal period has been extensively studied, the courses of depression from pregnancy to postpartum and risk factors among mothers and fathers together are not known. Design A cross‐sectional design was used. Methods This study included 110 couples registered at a family health centre in western Turkey. For the data collection, the Mother Introduction Form, the Father Introduction Form and the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale were used. The data were analysed by Mann–Whitney U, Kruskal–Wallis, Spearman correlation and logistic regression tests. Results The prevalence of postpartum depression was 9·1 and 1·8% for mothers and fathers, respectively. The Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale average score for mothers was 4·29 ± 5·33 points and 1·12 ± 2·75 points for fathers. The Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale scores were significantly higher in mothers who said that their relationship with their husbands was moderate or bad, who felt partly sufficient in the baby care, who were in difficulty in the baby care, who felt anxious for their motherhood and who said that they had not received support from anybody for baby care. The logistic analysis found that those feeling anxious about motherhood were at risk 5·6 times more than the others in developing postpartum depression. Conclusion Both mothers and fathers should be given consulting services about baby care and how they can manage with postpartum depression during postpartum period. Relevance to clinical practice This study highlights the utility of screening for the risk of postpartum depression during pregnancy and also during the early postpartum period.

Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04281.x

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:1-2:p:279-284

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Clinical Nursing from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().