‘Touching people in relationships’: a qualitative study of close relationships for people with an intellectual disability

Faye Sullivan, Keith Bowden, Karen McKenzie and Ethel Quayle

Journal of Clinical Nursing, 2013, vol. 22, issue 23-24, 3456-3466

Abstract: Aims and objectives To explore the experiences and perceptions of close and sexual relationships of people with an intellectual disability. Background Positive interpersonal relationships are beneficial for people with an intellectual disability, acting as a protective barrier against, social stigma and negative outcomes such as physical and mental health problems. The social networks of people with an intellectual disability are, however, often more restricted than those of the general population. There has been very little research exploring the views and experiences of people with an intellectual disability about social and sexual relationships. Design Exploratory study using a qualitative research design. Methods Semi‐structured interviews were conducted with 10 (6 male, 4 female) participants. Data were analysed using interpretive phenomenological analysis. Results ‘Touching other people in relationships’ was identified as a superordinate theme. The theme was represented by five subthemes: ‘Is wrong’; ‘Unsafe to talk about’; ‘Suggesting is safe’; ‘No freedom or fun’; and ‘Being touched’. The findings presented are drawn from a larger qualitative study. Conclusions The findings highlight the importance of touch and sexual behaviours in the close relationships of participants. Negative perceptions were observed to surround sexual behaviours. Rules and restrictions regarding physical contact were also described. Relevance to clinical practice Disseminating these findings may increase awareness of the importance of physical contact in the close relationships of people with an intellectual disability and promote positive support arrangements.

Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12375

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:23-24:p:3456-3466

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Clinical Nursing from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().