 Fever in children – a concept analysisEdward Purssell Journal of Clinical Nursing, 2014, vol. 23, issue 23-24, 3575-3582 Abstract: Aims and objectives To undertake a concept analysis to clarify the meaning of the term ‘fever’ in children and to identify models of fever‐related belief that may help in understanding the response of parents and professionals to fever in children. Background This concept analysis was undertaken because the approach to the treatment of fever varies widely and in particular that there is often a difference between what parents want for their children, official guidelines and what professionals do in practice. Design Concept analysis. Methods The study used a modified evolutionary method of concept analysis. The analysis was based on data from medical, nursing, popular and biological literature and used an iterative process to clarify the term. Results Fever has a number of distinct uses based on its meaning and history; these include its use to indicate an illness itself, as a beneficial symptom associated with disease, and a diagnostic sign. Three models of fever‐related practice emerged from the analysis, these being a phobic‐fearful approach that drives routine treatment, a scientific approach that sees fever as a potentially adaptive and beneficial response and a scientific but pragmatic approach that recognises potential benefit but results in treatment anyway. These different uses, which are often not clarified, go some way to explaining the different approaches to its treatment. Conclusions When parents, clinicians, physiologists and guideline writers discuss fever, they attribute different meanings to it, which may go some way to explaining the dissonance between theory and practice. In the absence of new knowledge, the emphasis of practitioners should therefore be on their safe use. Relevance to practice When discussing the meaning and treatment of fever, it is important to understand what is meant in different circumstances. The models of fever‐related beliefs outlined here may go some way to helping this process. Date: 2014 Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:23-24:p:3575-3582 Access Statistics for this article More articles in Journal of Clinical Nursing from John Wiley & Sons |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.