Positive impact on heat loss and patient experience of preheated skin disinfection: a randomised controlled trial
Camilla Wistrand,
Bo Söderquist and
Ulrica Nilsson
Journal of Clinical Nursing, 2016, vol. 25, issue 21-22, 3144-3151
Abstract:
Aims and objectives The aim of this study was to compare the effect of preheated (36 °C) and room‐temperature (20 °C) skin disinfectant solution on skin temperature and patients’ experience of the skin disinfection process. Background To prevent surgical site infections, it is important to disinfect skin prior to invasive surgery. In clinical practice, conscious patients often comment on the coldness of the preoperative skin disinfection solution. Evidence is lacking, as to whether preheated skin disinfectant has any positive effects during preoperative skin disinfection. Design Randomised controlled trial. Methods A total of 220 patients undergoing pacemaker, implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator, or cardiac resynchronisation therapy under local anaesthesia were included and randomly allocated to preheated or room‐temperature skin disinfection. Skin temperature was assessed before and after skin disinfection at the planned incision site; in addition, three study‐specific questions were used to assess how patients experienced the temperature. Results Patients experienced the skin disinfection process with preheated disinfectant as significantly more pleasant. They felt less cold and reported increased satisfaction with the temperature of the solution compared to patients who were disinfected with room‐temperature solution. Skin disinfection with preheated solution also yielded a significantly higher mean skin temperature compared to room‐temperature solution. Conclusions Preoperative skin disinfection with preheated disinfectant may prevent heat loss and contributes to a more pleasant experience for patients. Relevance to clinical practice Skin disinfection with preheated skin disinfectant is an easy and inexpensive nursing intervention that has a positive impact on heat loss and on patients’ experience of the disinfection process.
Date: 2016
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13263
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:21-22:p:3144-3151
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Journal of Clinical Nursing from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().