Unveiling self‐harm behaviour: what can social media site Twitter tell us about self‐harm? A qualitative exploration

Charlotte Emma Hilton

Journal of Clinical Nursing, 2017, vol. 26, issue 11-12, 1690-1704

Abstract: Aims and objectives To report the findings from a unique analysis of naturally occurring data regarding self‐harm behaviour generated through the global social media site, Twitter. Background Self‐harm behaviours are of global concern for health and social care practice. However, little is known about the experiences of those who harm and the attitudes of the general public towards such behaviours. A deeper, richer and more organic understanding of this is vital to informing global approaches to supporting individuals through treatment and recovery. Design Exploratory, qualitative design. Methods Three hundred and sixty‐two Twitter messages were subject to inductive thematic analysis. Results Five themes were identified: (1) celebrity influence, (2) self‐harm is not a joke (with subthemes of you wouldn't laugh if you loved me and you think it's funny, I think it's cruel), (3) support for and from others, (4) eating disorders and self‐harm and (5) videos and personal stories. Conclusions The findings indicate that self‐harm behaviour continues to be largely misunderstood by the general public and is often the source of ridicule which may contribute to delays in accessing treatment. Whilst Twitter may also provide a source of valuable support for those who self‐harm, the sense of community, relatedness and understanding generated by such support may contribute to normalising self‐harm and perpetuating the behaviours. Relevance to clinical practice Our understanding of the complexity of and aetiology and most effective treatment options for self‐harm behaviours is still unclear. The findings demonstrate that there is a critical opportunity to conduct further qualitative research to better understand self‐harm and to use these valuable and internationally relevant data to support the development of effective public education campaigns and personally tailored treatment options.

Date: 2017
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13575

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:11-12:p:1690-1704

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Clinical Nursing from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().