Do organisational constraints explain the use of restraint? A comparative ethnographic study from three nursing homes in Norway

Christine Øye, Frode Fadnes Jacobsen and Tone Elin Mekki

Journal of Clinical Nursing, 2017, vol. 26, issue 13-14, 1906-1916

Abstract: Aims and objectives To investigate (1) what kind of restraint is used in three nursing homes in Norway and (2) how staff use restraint under what organisational conditions. Background Restraint use in residents living with dementia in nursing homes is controversial, and at odds with fundamental human rights. Restraint is a matter of hindering residents’ free movement and will by applying either interactional, physical, medical, surveillance or environmental restraint. Previous research has identified use of restraint related to individual resident characteristics such as agitation, aggressiveness and wandering. Design This model is embedded in an overall mixed‐method education intervention design study called Modelling and evaluating evidence‐based continuing education program in dementia care (MEDCED), applying ethnography postintervention to examine the use of restraint in 24 nursing homes in Norway. Method Based on restraint diversity measured in the trial, ethnographic investigation was carried out in three different nursing homes in Norway over a 10‐month period to examine restraint use in relation to organisational constraints. Results Several forms of restraint were observed; among them, interactional restraint was used most frequently. We identified that use of restraint relates to the characteristics of individual residents, such as agitation, aggressiveness and wandering. However, restraint use should also be explained in relation to organisational conditions such as resident mix, staff culture and available human resources. Conclusion A fluctuating and dynamic interplay between different individual and contextual factors determines whether restraint is used – or not in particular situations with residents living with dementia. Relevance to clinical practice Educational initiatives targeting staff to reduce restraint must be sensitive towards fluctuating organisational constraints.

Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13504

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:13-14:p:1906-1916

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Clinical Nursing from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().