Mixed‐methods research in nursing – a critical review

Valentina Bressan, Annamaria Bagnasco, Giuseppe Aleo, Fiona Timmins, Michela Barisone, Monica Bianchi, Ramona Pellegrini and Loredana Sasso

Journal of Clinical Nursing, 2017, vol. 26, issue 19-20, 2878-2890

Abstract: Aims and objectives To review the use of mixed‐methods research in nursing with a particular focus on the extent to which current practice informs nurse researchers. It also aimed to highlight gaps in current knowledge, understanding and reporting of this type of research. Background Mixed‐methods research is becoming increasingly popular among nurses and healthcare professionals. Emergent findings from this type of research are very useful for nurses in practice. The combination of both quantitative and qualitative methods provides a scientific base for practice but also richness from the qualitative enquiry. However, at the same time mixed‐methods research is underdeveloped. Methods This study identified mixed‐methods research papers and critically evaluated their usefulness for research practice. To support the analysis, we performed a two‐stage search using CINAHL to find papers with titles that included the key term ‘mixed method’. Conclusion An analysis of studies that used mixed‐methods research revealed some inconsistencies in application and reporting. Attempts to use two distinct research methods in these studies often meant that one or both aspects had limitations. Overall methods were applied in a less rigorous way. This has implications for providing somewhat limited direction for novice researchers. There is also potential for application of evidence in healthcare practice that limited validity. Relevance to clinical practice This study highlights current gaps in knowledge, understanding and reporting of mixed‐methods research. While these methods are useful to gain insight into clinical problems nurses lack guidance with this type of research. This study revealed that the guidance provided by current mixed‐methods research is inconsistent and incomplete and this compounds the lack of available direction. There is an urgent need to develop robust guidelines for using mixed‐methods research so that findings may be critically implemented in practice.

Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13631

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:19-20:p:2878-2890

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Clinical Nursing from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().