Factors associated with midwives’ job satisfaction and intention to stay in the profession: An integrative review
Dianne Bloxsome,
Deborah Ireson,
Gemma Doleman and
Sara Bayes
Journal of Clinical Nursing, 2019, vol. 28, issue 3-4, 386-399
Abstract:
Aims and objectives To conduct an integrative review of the factors associated with why midwives stay in midwifery. Background Midwifery retention and attrition are globally acknowledged as an issue. However, little is known as to why midwives stay in midwifery as the focus has previously focussed on why they leave. Design A structured six‐step integrative review approach was used, and this involved the development of a search strategy, study selection and critical appraisal, data abstraction and synthesis, interpretation of findings and recommendations for future practice. Methods The review was conducted using the databases MEDLINE, CINAHL and PsychInfo. Included studies were in the English language with an unlimited publication date. Results Six studies were included in this review: one qualitative, two quantitative and three using mixed methods. Seven themes emerged from synthesisation of the data reported for the six included studies that together help answer the question of why midwives stay in midwifery. Conclusion This integrative review has highlighted some important factors that assist in answering the question why midwives stay in midwifery. However, it has also highlighted the need for quality data that reflects the range of contexts in which midwifery is practised. Relevance to clinical practice There is an abundance of literature focussing on why midwives leave the profession; however, the gap exists in the reasons why midwives stay. If we can uncover this important detail, then changes within the profession can begin to be implemented, addressing the shortage of midwives issue that has been seen globally for a large number of years.
Date: 2019
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14651
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:3-4:p:386-399
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Journal of Clinical Nursing from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().