Partners' experiences of living with men who have screening‐detected abdominal aortic aneurysms: A qualitative descriptive study

Anna Ericsson, Elisabeth Carlson, Shirley Siu‐yin Ching, Alex Molassiotis and Christine Kumlien

Journal of Clinical Nursing, 2020, vol. 29, issue 19-20, 3711-3720

Abstract: Aim To describe partners' experiences of living with men with a screening‐detected abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Background Diagnosis of a chronic life‐threatening disease affects the patients' as well as their partners' lives in different aspects. AAA, with rupture as the major consequence, is a life‐threatening disease that can affect the whole family. Screening programmes for AAA have been introduced in several countries to reduce the mortality rate. Although the awareness of having an AAA influences the individuals' quality of life and well‐being, it is still unclear how it affects their partners. Design Qualitative descriptive design. Methods Twenty‐one partners of men with AAA were purposely selected to participate in individual semi‐structured interviews between August 2017–February 2018 in Sweden. Data were transcribed and imported into NVivo‐12®. The data were analysed using qualitative content analysis. The study conforms to the COREQ checklist. Results Three categories were identified: (a) experiencing the unexpected; (b) being reminded of fragility; and (c) balancing a changing relationship. The partners had a positive attitude towards the screening process and were pleased that their husbands were under surveillance. Nevertheless, at the same time, the diagnosis caused worries and questions. The AAA diagnosis was constantly in the minds of the partners, which sometimes affected and limited daily activities. Furthermore, ambivalent feelings towards surgical treatment were described. The partners tried to support their men and encouraged them to achieve a healthy lifestyle. Conclusion The partners' well‐being and daily lives were impacted by the awareness of the screening‐detected AAA. Different degrees of worry were the most common reaction and were pervasive in all three categories. Relevance for clinical practice The result highlights the need to review routines or develop new strategies to include the partners in the process of screening and offer supplementary support and information.

Date: 2020
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15399

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:19-20:p:3711-3720

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Clinical Nursing from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().