Restructuring for resilience: The NASA model

Ronald D. Brunner
Additional contact information
Ronald D. Brunner: Professor of Political Science, Center for Public Policy Research, University of Colorado, Boulder, Postal: Professor of Political Science, Center for Public Policy Research, University of Colorado, Boulder

Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 1994, vol. 13, issue 3, 492-505

Abstract: Two decades of incremental decisions have locked in a vision of human space exploration through an interdependent civil space program centered on the Shuttle and the Space Station. The program lacks the resilience necessary to contain cost overruns, schedule slips, and capability cutbacks. The result is overcommitment, which makes it difficult to sustain the program in a budget-constrained environment. Coping with overcommitment through budget cuts in space science, applications, and technology could split the post-Apollo coalition and jeopardize NASA as an institution. Alternatively, terminating the Space Station could eliminate overcommitment, strengthen NASA's political base, and facilitate restructuring toward a resilient program that is sustainable. A restructured NASA might once again become a model for other agencies.

Date: 1994
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/3325388 Link to full text; subscription required (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:jpamgt:v:13:y:1994:i:3:p:492-505

DOI: 10.2307/3325388

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Policy Analysis and Management from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().