EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Not equitable, not efficient: U.S. policy on low-level radioactive waste disposal

Dennis Coates, Victoria Heid and Michael Munger
Additional contact information
Victoria Heid: Budget Analyst, Fiscal Research Division, Maryland General Assembly, Postal: Budget Analyst, Fiscal Research Division, Maryland General Assembly

Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 1994, vol. 13, issue 3, 526-538

Abstract: Elected officials and policy analysts alike often treat equity and efficiency as distinct concerns. In this case study, focusing on U.S. policy for disposing of low-level radioactive waste, we consider an instance where the distinction between equity and efficiency is difficult to sustain. The “equity, then efficiency” approach embodied in the compact system of regional agreements is largely to blame for the current crisis facing generators, regulatory officials, and citizens. We find that nearly three times more waste disposal facilities are being contemplated than are financially viable. More generally, it is claimed that the approach for achieving an equitable solution must be very carefully designed, and that the concept of economic efficiency must be considered (at least in this case study) as part of the definition of equity. This case study is unusual, because we are able to make a recommendation that improves both efficiency and equity.

Date: 1994
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/3325390 Link to full text; subscription required (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:jpamgt:v:13:y:1994:i:3:p:526-538

DOI: 10.2307/3325390

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Policy Analysis and Management from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:wly:jpamgt:v:13:y:1994:i:3:p:526-538