EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The use of client surveys to gauge the threat of contamination in welfare reform experiments

Michael J. Camasso, Radha Jagannathan, Carol Harvey and Mark Killingsworth
Additional contact information
Radha Jagannathan: Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers University, Postal: Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers University
Carol Harvey: Center for State Health Care Policy, Rutgers University, Postal: Center for State Health Care Policy, Rutgers University
Mark Killingsworth: Department of Economics, Rutgers University, Postal: Department of Economics, Rutgers University

Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 2003, vol. 22, issue 2, 207-223

Abstract: This paper examines the type of evidence policy analysts have used to identify the presence and magnitude of contamination in welfare reform experiments. Peter Rossi's critique of the New Jersey Family Development Program evaluation motivates the following discussion. In this critique Rossi and others contend that client misperception about experimental control-group assignment resulted in contamination that negates reported treatment effectiveness. By applying the framework of the Rubin Causal Model (RCM) to isolate “pure” and “impure” experimental and control cases, the actual group assignment and not self-reported membership is shown to be a more accurate gauge of treatment level and effect. The analysis reveals that the form of contamination Rossi detected leads to underestimates of treatment effects, not their evaporation. While contamination is a legitimate threat in any research design its identification must be based on empirical measures. © 2003 by the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management.

Date: 2003
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/pam.10114 Link to full text; subscription required (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:jpamgt:v:22:y:2003:i:2:p:207-223

DOI: 10.1002/pam.10114

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Policy Analysis and Management from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:wly:jpamgt:v:22:y:2003:i:2:p:207-223