EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Alternative measures of economic success among TANF participants: Avoiding poverty, hardship, and dependence on public assistance

Maria Cancian () and Daniel R. Meyer
Additional contact information
Daniel R. Meyer: School of Social Work, and an Affiliate, Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin, Postal: School of Social Work, and an Affiliate, Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin

Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 2004, vol. 23, issue 3, 531-548

Abstract: Current debates about the success of TANF reforms have been obscured by the use of inconsistent indicators of success, as well as by measurement difficulties associated with alternative indicators. This paper considers conceptual and measurement issues associated with three different indicators of economic well-being: independence from public assistance, having income above the poverty threshold, and freedom from material hardship. Survey and administrative data from a sample of TANF participants illustrate the sensitivity of conclusions to alternative ways of measuring each indicator. Also considered is the extent to which dependence, poverty, and hardship coincide, or capture important differences in outcomes. The principles underlying TANF reforms have implications for appropriate measures of economic well-being, as the empirical importance of these implications demonstrates. © 2004 by the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management.

Date: 2004
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (27)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/pam.20025 Link to full text; subscription required (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:jpamgt:v:23:y:2004:i:3:p:531-548

DOI: 10.1002/pam.20025

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Policy Analysis and Management from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:wly:jpamgt:v:23:y:2004:i:3:p:531-548