“Just give me a number!” Practical values for the social discount rate
Mark A. Moore,
Anthony Boardman,
Aidan Vining,
David Weimer and
David Greenberg
Additional contact information
Mark A. Moore: Simon Fraser University, Postal: Simon Fraser University
Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 2004, vol. 23, issue 4, 789-812
Abstract:
A major reason the quality of cost-benefit analysis (CBA) varies widely is inconsistent use of the social discount rate (SDR). This article offers guidance about the choice of the SDR. Namely, we recommend the following procedures: If the project is intragenerational (does not have effects beyond 50 years) and there is no crowding out of private investment, then discount all flows at 3.5 percent; if the project is intragenerational and there is some crowding out of investment, then weight investment flows by the shadow price of capital of 1.1 and then discount at 3.5 percent; if the project is intergenerational and there is no crowding out of investment, then use a time-declining scale of discount rates; if the project is intergenerational and investment is crowded out, then convert investment flows during the first 50 years to consumption equivalents using a shadow price of 1.1, and then discount all of these flows at 3.5 percent, and discount all flows after the 50th year using time-declining rates. We then compare current discounting practices of U.S. federal agencies with our estimates. Consistent use of the recommended rates would eliminate arbitrary choices of discount rates and would lead to better public sector decision-making. © 2004 by the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management.
Date: 2004
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (64)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/pam.20047 Link to full text; subscription required (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:jpamgt:v:23:y:2004:i:4:p:789-812
DOI: 10.1002/pam.20047
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Journal of Policy Analysis and Management from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().