The distributional impact of in-kind public benefits in European countries
Holly Sutherland and
Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 2010, vol. 29, issue 2, 243-266
International comparisons of inequality based on measures of disposable income may not be valid if the size and incidence of publicly provided in-kind benefits differ across the countries considered. The benefits that are financed by taxation in one country may need to be purchased out of disposable income in another. We estimate the size and incidence of in-kind or “noncash” benefits from public housing subsidies, education, and health care for five European countries using comparable methods and data. Inequality in the augmented income measure is dramatically lower than in disposable income, with the effects of the three components varying in importance across countries. Adapting equivalence scales to take proper account of differences in needs for health care and education across population members reduces the scale of the effect, but does not eliminate it. © 2010 by the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management.
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (56) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/pam.20490 Link to full text; subscription required (text/html)
Working Paper: The distributional impact of in kind public benefits in European countries (2009)
Working Paper: The Distributional Impact of In Kind Public Benefits in European Countries (2009)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:jpamgt:v:29:y:2010:i:2:p:243-266
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Journal of Policy Analysis and Management from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().