Limited government: An incoherent concept

Steven Kelman
Additional contact information
Steven Kelman: Associate Professor at the John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Postal: Associate Professor at the John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University

Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 1983, vol. 3, issue 1, 31-44

Abstract: Advocates of limited government argue that the role of government should be limited to preventing the use of coercion in exchanges and stopping people from harming others. They believe that government should not seek to change the distribution of wealth from that arising through voluntary exchange nor to influence the preferences people hold. But this view proves to be self-contradictory or incoherent. In order to define coercion and permissible harm, governments must make enormous numbers of determinations about how people are entitled to behave. These determinations, in addition to demanding extensive government activity, will also have important effects on the distribution of wealth and the preferences people hold.

Date: 1983
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/3324003 Link to full text; subscription required (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:jpamgt:v:3:y:1983:i:1:p:31-44

DOI: 10.2307/3324003

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Policy Analysis and Management from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().