The postal service: Economics made simplistic

William B. Tye
Additional contact information
William B. Tye: Principal in Putnam, Hayes & Bartlett, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, Postal: Principal in Putnam, Hayes & Bartlett, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts

Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 1983, vol. 3, issue 1, 62-73

Abstract: The so-called Inverse Elasticity Rule has almost the unanimous support of economists when they prescribe how a regulated firm should price the various products or services it offers. The U.S. Postal Service relied heavily on this rule and its endorsement by professional economists in pricing its various postal services. But the policy produced results of doubtful social value, and a series of court decisions eventually struck it down. This experience illustrates the dangers of narrowly applying the principles of economic theory, as well as the risks of ignoring practical problems of implementation.

Date: 1983
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/3324005 Link to full text; subscription required (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:jpamgt:v:3:y:1983:i:1:p:62-73

DOI: 10.2307/3324005

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Policy Analysis and Management from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().