Similarities and differences between stockpiling and reference effects
Robert Slonim and
Ellen Garbarino
Additional contact information
Ellen Garbarino: Discipline of Marketing, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, Postal: Discipline of Marketing, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
Managerial and Decision Economics, 2009, vol. 30, issue 6, 351-371
Abstract:
The correlation of past prices and demand is commonly attributed to reference effects. Although reference dependence is robust, support for loss aversion is mixed; some find demand more sensitive to price increases, consistent with loss aversion, others find no difference or greater sensitivity to price decreases. Stockpiling offers an explanation for these mixed findings. Combining theory, analytical models and simulations, stockpiling and reference dependence predict similar effects and the more stockable the product, the greater sensitivity of demand to price decreases, the opposite of loss aversion. We show that a model combining stockpiling and reference effects best aligns with previous findings and under what conditions each effect should dominate. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/mde.1453 Link to full text; subscription required (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:30:y:2009:i:6:p:351-371
DOI: 10.1002/mde.1453
Access Statistics for this article
Managerial and Decision Economics is currently edited by Antony Dnes
More articles in Managerial and Decision Economics from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().